Americans just cannot get enough of football on television.
In accordance with a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Although ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, millions of viewers keep watching, even if oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a game that drew just 20,256 fans last week but attracted the average television audience of 1,114,000, based on ESPN.”
Schrotenboer continues to express, “Only one bowl game a year ago drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers normally, based on Nielsen. That’s better than the 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game a year ago involving the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Can you imagine then the following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds a unique television studio strictly for the purpose of hosting college bowl games. The tv screen network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In this way, it has no middleman to cope with for these additional events, eliminating being forced to negotiate with a different facility to host the game. No costs for having to drive production trailers or fly technical crews halfway over the country.
Because this facility will be built as a tv studio and not being an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN will make attending the bowl game a real multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee along with the tv viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio would have merely a limited number of seats, say 5,000 or less, which may minimize construction costs. The studio would not have to be much larger than the typical college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough to show to the million plus viewers there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be considered a single bad seat in the house. You’d be assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate throughout the facility.
Because of the limited method of getting seats, this may force ticket demand (and prices) up. Forget about 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities that are less than the usual quarter full. It would be a 180-degree change from the existing experience, where many schools need to depend on daily deal sites to greatly help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit simply because they wouldn’t have to choose the thousands of tickets which they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could use this facility multiple times during the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
For instance, in 2010 five additional college football teams qualified for a dish that they certainly were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network are not generating millions of dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers would prefer to be buying time on a tv program that most viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also are interested – going to a dish game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”